Let's back way up first, and talk about the original U.I. for constructing ships: At the beginning of time (StarWright's lifetime, anyway), designing starships was done using a user interface that was completely separate from the gameplay:
You'd hop into the "Builder" and design your ship on a grid. When you were happy with your design and wanted to test it, you'd press the "Save & Test" button, which would switch you to a testing game environment where you could spawn enemy ships to test your ship's combat prowess against.
And then I watched a talk by Bret Victor in which he persuasively argued that user interfaces are hampered when the user makes a choice but the feedback from the user interface about that choice is delayed. I realized that StarWright (called "ShipBuilder" at the time) suffered from the same delay in that the player didn't see the effects of their design changes until they actually hit the "Save & Test" button. This was unlike most other "construction" games such as SimCity in which you can immediately see how placing a building effects things like power, water, and roads. And so I decided to merge the ship editor and gameplay environment into a new environment that I called the "Sandbox":
In this new environment you could add a part to your ship (like a cannon) and very quickly see how that new part interacts with the simulation of your ship as a whole (crew running over to operate it) and any problems that it has (crew can't get any ammo to it). (I wrote about this change more extensively in a blog post from way back in 2012.)
This was a really big improvement! Being able to watch a ship operate as it was designed really made learning the rules of the ship simulation much more intuitive, and players felt like they were making much more informed (and successful) ship design decisions.
Now let's fast forward again by a few years (I had a job, okay?) to late 2015, as I was beginning to ramp development on StarWright back up to full speed. Up to this point, there was no real challenge or economy in the game; it was just a free-form sandbox mode where you could build whatever you want. And while creative/sandbox modes in these kinds of games are great (yes, I plan on keeping the "Creative Mode" forever and ever), my ultimate vision for the game was that the player would start with a small ship, earn money by going on missions and defeating enemy ships, and expand their own ship over time.
But this caused a couple of conflicts with how ships were built:
- Adding parts to ships needed to cost money, but the player shouldn't be forced to waste money when they accidentally place a part in the wrong location or if they change their mind halfway through an in-progress design.
- It needed to be easy and convenient for the player to restore a partially-destroyed ship back to its intended design.
My solution to these two problems was to introduce the "Blueprint" mode, which separated a ship's design (i.e., its blueprints) from its current physical condition:
I talk more about the Blueprint mode in another blog post, but to summarize how it solved these two problems:
- Players would make modifications to the ship's blueprints instead of the ship itself. The player could freely modify the blueprints without being charged any money. Once the player was satisfied with their design, they pressed the big "MAKE IT SO" button on the right, and -- voila! -- their ship was updated to match their blueprint design and the appropriate amount of money was subtracted from their funds. (If you're thinking, "But Walt, wasn't being able to immediately see the results of design changes a good thing? Why get rid of that?", then my only response to you is, I wish you were there to remind me of that in Nov. 2015!)
- While a ship could take damage and have parts of it completely destroyed, its blueprints would remain unaffected. If the player wanted to repair their ship back to its intended design, they could just open up the Blueprints mode and click "MAKE IT SO" again.
The first problem I realized that blueprints had was with repairing: While it was definitely A Good Thing that players were able to easily repair their ship back to its original state, I quickly discovered that players (including me) would often do the following:
- Fight and defeat an enemy, taking some damage and earning some bounty money.
- Open up the Blueprint mode and design some awesome additions for their ship.
- Realize they can't afford their new awesome design, and so decide to go earn another bounty.
- Want to repair their ship, but realize they can't without undoing all their glorious design work!
- Get really angry.
And so I decided to add a "Repair" option. When this option was selected, pressing the "MAKE IT SO" button, instead of making your ship's physical condition match its blueprints, would make your ship match how it was the last time you pressed that button.
And this is how it's worked for the past few months. All problems solved?
Of course not:
- I realized (again) that players were having a harder time designing their ships because they weren't getting immediate feedback from the game simulation on their design changes. Somehow, in my excitement to make Bounty Mode work, I had forgotten that immediate feedback was A Really Good Thing.
- The "Repair" option next to the "MAKE IT SO" button was both confusing and limiting. Confusing because it was a very important feature that was buried as an option inside the Blueprint mode user interface despite having, literally, nothing to do with blueprints. And limiting because it was an all-or-nothing choice; there was no option to selectively repair only certain parts of your ship.
And so I embarked on my weeks-long journey to fix these two problems...
First up, I decided to dedicate a separate user interface to repairing ships; a U.I. which would be accessed by its own "Repair" button sitting co-equally right next to the "Build" button.
And so I started to work on-- screeeech, halt! ... Nevermind. Instead, I decided to first implement another U.I. feature that I'd been wanting for a while. Even though that feature wasn't really necessary to solve the above problems, its code would be very intertwined with the code for solving the above problems, and it'd take less time to implement it before solving those problems than after. This feature was the Ship Hub:
The general idea behind the Ship Hub was that it'd be the place on the screen where the player would go to interact with their ship in any way. The dark rectangular card shows a silhouette icon of the ship, it's name, and some other basic information. (And the '...' button exposes some lesser-used options that used to be in the super-awkward alt-right-click menu.) Above the informational card would be all the buttons to access various ship features, such as the ship design U.I. and, eventually, repairs and crew. The Ship Hub was released in version 0.7.1.
With the Ship Hub completed and out-of-the-way, I did, finally, implement the new repairing U.I.:
The "Repair Mode" is accessed by clicking the green wrench icon next to the Build button.
The cool thing about Repair Mode is that it shows you exactly which parts are damaged or destroyed with a red wrench icon for damaged parts or a red overlay for missing destroyed parts. Clicking on a damaged or missing part will repair that specific part. Or you can simply click the big "REPAIR ALL" button to fix everything at once!
I'm pretty happy with this new Repair Mode user interface. It's much more easily accessed and prominently displayed, and it is also much more flexible since you can, optionally, pick individual parts to be repaired. Repair Mode was released in version 0.7.2.
Also released in 0.7.2 was a little U.I. for managing your ship's crew:
This shows you your current number of crew relative to the number of crew your ship can carry. And it has three buttons for adjusting the number of crew: The first button adds one crew, the second button fills your ship up to its maximum crew capacity (or as many crew as you can afford to hire), and the third button fires one crew. That's it!
This also wasn't strictly necessary for solving those two big problems, but it was easy to implement and is nice to have. Eventually I plan on having individual crew members with different ranks and abilities, and this user interface will be fleshed out to manage them.
0.7.3 and 0.7.4 were interim bugfix released that I put out while I was working on revamping the user interface for designing ships.
With repairing ships handled via a completely separate interface, I realized that the only major design impediment to letting the player directly add and remove parts from their ship was the risk of them wasting money by making accidental mistakes or backtracking on their design. And then I realized that the only reason this was actually a problem was that removing a part didn't refund the full cost of adding that part in the first place (it refunded 75%). And so I made the decision to refund the player the full original cost when removing a part, and now the player can undo any design change they make without having wasted any money. (I had originally added the 25% "deconstruction" tax as a way to incentivize picking a design and sticking with it, but I think being able to directly modify your ship and freely experiment is worth getting rid of the tax.)
And so with that last design hurdle out-of-the-way, I split ship designing into two separate modes: Direct Edit mode and Blueprint mode...
Blueprint mode isn't much changed from how it worked these past few months: You can freely make modifications to your ship's blueprints without regard for cost, and then when you're happy with them, you press the "MAKE IT SO" button. In fact, Blueprint mode has gotten even better, because now it will let you temporarily place blueprints in illegal locations as you plan things out, so long as you fix any problems before clicking "MAKE IT SO".
|Direct Edit mode|
Direct Edit mode on the other hand is brand new. In this mode you directly add and remove parts to and from your ship, being charged or refunded as you go. (And behind-the-scenes, the blueprints will be kept up-to-date with your changes as well.) It's somewhat more restrictive than Blueprint mode in that you can't make any change that would put your ship into an illegal configuration. But on the flip side, you can see the immediate effects or problems of any changes you make, such as whether crew can access a room or whether a laser cannon has power.
Both modes are accessed by clicking the "Build" button in the lower-left above the ship information card. The Direct Edit mode will be shown by default (although if you prefer Blueprint mode, you can make it the default in the settings), and you can then switch to Blueprint mode by clicking the blue blueprints button that expands out from the build button.
There are some restrictions to when you can use Direct Edit mode that don't apply to Blueprint mode. In particular, you can't use Direct Edit mode during combat or while in debt. In addition, if your ship has any destroyed parts, those parts must be repaired before entering Direct Edit. And if you've made any modifications in blueprint mode, those modifications must be either committed or discarded before returning to Direct Edit mode. (If you open the ship designer and Direct Edit mode is unavailable for any reason, Blueprint mode will be shown instead.) These restrictions are necessary to make sure that you can't make any changes in Direct Edit mode that would break either the Blueprint or Repair modes.
I also took the opportunity to improve the design experience of both Direct Edit and Blueprint modes in some nice ways:
- While in either Direct Edit or Blueprint modes, the background is dimmed and a build grid is displayed underneath your ship. This should make it easier to eyeball distances and also make it more obvious when you're in design mode instead of being able to control your ship.
- The cost (or refund) of making any changes to your ship is shown underneath the mouse cursor.
- The logic that determines where to automatically add doors between parts has been greatly improved, especially when the "Overwrite Existing Parts" option is turned on (as it is now by default). It will no longer remove any doors that didn't actually need to be removed, and it's much smarter and more aggressive about adding doors as new parts are placed. This is the kind of improvement that, if it works well, you won't notice it at all!
- Adding a Crew's Quarters or Crew's Bunk in Direct Edit mode will, by default, automatically hire crew to go along with it.
- And lots of other little improvements that you can read about in the version history.
As always, thanks for playing! And please post whatever feedback you have!
Any plans for the pricing of this game? I know all of your games are free but I wouldn't mind making a (small XD) donation for it.ReplyDelete
After all, this managed to scratch an itch I didn't even know I had
Thanks so much for thinking the game is worth money! :DDelete
This game is my full-time "job" now, and no, I'm not rich. So yes, I *do* plan on selling the game in the future.
For now, I'd like to keep it free until I actually need the money, since a free game is likely to attract more players than a pay game. And once I decide to start selling it, it'll probably start at $5-10 (USD) and increase over time as it gets bigger and better to probably $15-20.
If you'd like to do something to help right *now*, then please share the game with any friends you think might like it! And talk about it online! Getting people interested in the game is way more valuable to me right now than a little bit of money.
Thanks so much! :)
Of course I would share this whenever it is appropriate, however my personal view is that the game is lacking some graphical Force majeure to attract people.Delete
The gameplay and core of the game is already there (though it does need to be expanded), and for people like me who are attracted more for the gameplay (easily design-able ships) then you already have it sold; but considering this is a niche game I feel like the graphics are really lacking for the majority of the people. Once the tedium of building your ship over you are treated to the interior and not the exterior. Once I spend 5 minutes customizing my ship, I would probably spend 5 more customizing the exterior (maybe add turrets or something?).
Then we could make montages with massive, epic looking ships shooting Ion Beams at each other - instead of ships made of white, black and green with lots of little things running around inside them.
Of course this is only my personal view from a consumer - I claim no knowledge of marketing or anything like that. But as a gamer, if I were to buy the game (ignoring the fact that I would buy it as is right now), then I would expect some exterior customization with turrets/torpedoes and such.
Thanks for hearing me out!
P.S When can we expect mirror building? Lining up each side to the other is really getting to me when building big ships.
This is great feedback! I *am* planning to add ship exteriors with aesthetic customization. (Like being able to pick colors and paint patterns/decals/symbols tile-by-tile.) I'm less sure about being able to add weapons to the top of a ship, because that might cause balance problems.Delete
Yeah, mirror building would be nice to have. I'll try to think about the best way to handle that.
Thanks a bunch!
I better upload all my old ships (and some of my new ones) before they get too obsolete. Also, if the offer for adding ships into the game still stands, I would love to see some of these as enemies :D.ReplyDelete
I also wrote a short description for each ship because I had too much time on my hands. Nobody has to read my terrible writing if they don't have to.
P.S The Eater of Worlds will eat your memory if you run the game in any speed other than pause or one. You have been warned.
These ships are awesome!Delete
I haven't added any new enemy ships in a while because it's actually kind of a pain to do that. I've been meaning to simplify the system so that you can just drop a ship file into a folder and it'll start spawning as a bounty. Once I do that, I think about including ships from players.
The next version of the game should have some pretty significant performance improvements, especially for larger ships with lots of crew.
Wow, I read your reply to my reddit post about the performance updates, but I didn't expect this much. Can run 2 eater of worlds at the same time now :DReplyDelete
Nice! Glad to hear the performance improvements have helped so much!Delete
I'm curious to know what your computer's CPU and GPU specs are?
CPU is FX 6300ReplyDelete
GPU is R9 380
It's not exactly enthusiast level hardware, but it's still pretty high end and can play most games on high/ultra at 1080p.
Interesting process. I need to remember this when I finally get around to progression mechanics in Battlefleet Engineer.ReplyDelete